Handbuch Osteuropa
 Finanzierungs- und Förderprogramme

HomeNewsletterNewsDatabaseForumSearch
United Nations Convention on the Assignment of Receivables in International Trade
Articles - IMF
Articles - IBRD
Links:
German Industry Associations
Int. Institutions
UN-Kaufrecht CISG
UN-Charta
EU-VO: Gerichtliche Zuständigkeit in Zivil- und Handelssachen
Strategy Paper 2002
Strategy Paper 2001
NACE Revision 1.1
Trade Statistics
EU Links
Links:
EU Enlargement
EU Institutions
EU Geschichte
Überblick Nizzavertrag
EG-Vertrag (PDF)
Nizza-Vertrag (PDF) Strategiepapier 2002
Strategiepapier 2001
Gerichtszuständigkeit, Anerkennung und Vollstreckung von Urteilen
Zusammenarbeit bei Beweisaufnahmen
NACE Revision 1.1
Statistiken (Handel)
Links:
EU Osterweiterung
EU Institutionen
allg. Osteuropa/GUS
EU: Export im Binnenmarkt
Model Tax Treaty
Commission: Strategy Paper and Report 2002
Hungary: EU Accession Report 2002
Estonia: Tax Treaty between Austria and Estonia
Ukraine: Tax Treaty Austria
Bulgaria: BFIA - Business Guide 04/2002
Slovenia: Tax Treaty Austria
Kyrgyz Republic: Tax Treaty Austria
Czech: Austria Tax Treaty

Commentary

55.
These Guidelines are intended to emphasise the importance of competition laws and policies to the efficient operation of both domestic and international markets, to reaffirm the importance of compliance with those laws and policies by domestic and multinational enterprises, and to ensure that all enterprises are aware of developments concerning the number, scope, and severity of competition laws and in the extent of co-operation among competition authorities. The term ``competition'' law is used to refer to laws, including both ``antitrust'' and ``antimonopoly'' laws, that prohibit collective or unilateral action to
(a)
abuse market power or dominance,
(b)
acquire market power or dominance by means other than efficient performance, or
(c)
engage in anti-competitive agreements.
56.
In general, competition laws and policies prohibit
(a)
hard core cartels;
(b)
other agreements that are deemed to be anti-competitive;
(c)
conduct that exploits or extends market dominance or market power; and
(d)
anti-competitive mergers and acquisitions.

Under the 1998 Recommendation of the OECD Council Concerning Effective Action Against Hard Core Cartels, C(98)35/Final, the anti-competitive agreements referred to in sub (a) constitute hard core cartels, but the Recommendation incorporates differences in Member countries' laws, including differences in the laws' exemptions or provisions allowing for an exception or authorisation for activity that might otherwise be prohibited. These guidelines should not be interpreted as suggesting that enterprises should not avail themselves of such exemptions or provisions. The categories sub (b) and (c) are more general because the effects of other kinds of agreements and of unilateral conduct are more ambiguous, and there is less consensus on what should be considered anti-competitive.

57.
The goal of competition policy is to contribute to overall social welfare and economic growth by creating and maintaining market conditions in which the nature, quality, and price of goods and services are determined by market forces except to the extent a jurisdiction considers necessary to achieve other goals. In addition to benefiting consumers and a jurisdiction's economy as a whole, such a competitive environment rewards enterprises that respond efficiently to consumer demand, and enterprises should provide information and advice when governments are considering laws and policies that might reduce their efficiency or otherwise affect the competitiveness of markets. .
58.
Enterprises should be aware that competition laws are being enacted in a rapidly increasing number of jurisdictions, and that it is increasingly common for those laws to prohibit anti-competitive activities that occur abroad if they have a harmful impact on domestic consumers. Moreover, the growth of cross-border trade and investment makes it more likely that anti-competitive conduct taking place in one jurisdiction will have harmful effects in other jurisdictions. As a result, anti-competitive unilateral or concerted conduct that is or may be legal where it occurs is increasingly likely to be illegal in another jurisdiction. Enterprises should therefore take into account both the law of the country in which they are operating and the laws of all countries in which the effects of their conduct are likely to be felt.
59.
Finally, enterprises should understand that competition authorities are engaging in more and deeper co-operation in investigating and challenging anti-competitive activity. See generally: Recommendation of the Council Concerning Co-operation between Member Countries on Anticompetitive Practices Affecting International Trade, C(95)130/Final; Making International Markets More Efficient Through ``Positive Comity'' in Competition Law Enforcement, Report of the OECD Committee on Competition Law and Policy, DAFFE/CLP(99)19. When the competition authorities of various jurisdictions are reviewing the same conduct, enterprises' facilitation of co-operation among the authorities promotes consistent and sound decision-making while also permitting cost savings for governments and enterprises.
Currency Exchange
Message Board
Feedback
PDF download
Contribution
Albania
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Bosnia & Herzegovina
Bulgaria
Croatia
Czech Republic
Estonia
Georgia
Hungary
Kazakhstan
Kyrgyzstan
Latvia
Lithuania
Macedonia
Moldova
Poland
Romania
Russia
Serbia & Montenegro
Slovakia
Slovenia
Tajikistan
Turkmenistan
Ukraine
Uzbekistan
About FiFo Ost | Privacy | Legal Disclaimer | Contact | Forum | Deutsche Version