![]() |
|
|||||||||||||
Commission Report (2002): Polanda) PrefaceIn Agenda 2000, the Commission said it would report regularly to the European Council on progress made by each of the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe with preparations for membership, and that it would submit its first Report at the end of 1998.The Luxembourg European Council decided that: ``From the end of 1998, the Commission will make Regular Reports to the Council, together with any necessary recommendations for opening bilateral intergovernmental conferences, reviewing the progress of each Central and Eastern European applicant State towards accession in the light of the Copenhagen criteria, in particular the rate at which it is adopting the Union acquis'' [...] ``The Commission's reports will serve as the basis for taking, in the Council context, the necessary decisions on the conduct of the accession negotiations or their extension to other applicants. In that context, the Commission will continue to follow the method adopted by Agenda 2000 in evaluating applicant States' ability to meet the economic criteria and fulfil the obligations deriving from accession''. On this basis, the Commission presented a first series of Regular Reports in October 1998, a second in October 1999, a third in November 2000, and a fourth in November 2001. In its 2001 Enlargement Strategy Paper, which accompanied the 2001 Regular Reports, the Commission indicated that, given the pace of negotiations and the progress made so far, the Commission should be able to make recommendations on those candidate countries ready for accession on the basis of its 2002 Regular Reports. At its meeting in Seville in June 2001, the European Council concluded that ``in order to enable the European Council to be held in the coming autumn to decide which will be the candidate countries with which negotiations can be concluded at the end of 2002, [...] the Commission will have to draft appropriate recommendations in the light of the Regular Reports''. The Commission has prepared this fifth series of Regular Reports with a view to the Brussels European Council in autumn 2002. The structure followed for this Regular Report is largely the same as that used for the 2000 and 2001 Regular Reports. In line with previous Regular Reports, the present Report:
Furthermore, in view of the fact that the 2002 Regular Reports will provide the basis on which the Commission will formulate its recommendations as to which countries are ready to conclude negotiations, this Report includes an evaluation of Poland's track record since the 1997 Opinion. As regards the economic criteria, the report also provides a dynamic, forward-looking evaluation of Poland's economic performance. For each of the negotiating chapters, this report provides a summary evaluation of the extent to which commitments made in the negotiations have been implemented, as well as an overview of transitional arrangements that have been granted. The commitments made by each country reflect the result of the accession negotiations, and, in accordance with the principle of differentiation underlying the negotiation process, may differ between countries. Where negotiating countries have committed themselves to completing specific measures by the time of accession, the Commission assesses the relevant preparatory processes. For chapters on which the accession negotiations continue, and final commitments remain to be defined, an indicative assessment is given of the state of implementation of the commitments that have been made to date. The Report further includes a separate section examining the extent to which Poland has addressed the Accession Partnership priorities. This section also assesses the progress Poland has made in implementing the measures set out in the Action plan for strengthening administrative and judicial capacity that the Commission developed with each negotiating country in the spring of 2002. As has been the case in previous Reports, ``progress'' has been measured on the basis of decisions actually taken, legislation actually adopted, international conventions actually ratified (with due attention being given to implementation), and measures actually implemented. As a matter of principle, legislation or measures which are in various stages of either preparation or Parliamentary approval have not been taken into account. This approach ensures equal treatment for all the candidate countries and permits an objective assessment of each country in terms of their concrete progress in preparing for accession. The Report draws on numerous sources of information. The candidate
countries have been invited to provide information on progress made in
preparations for membership since the publication of the last Regular Report.
The information each of the candidate countries has provided within the
framework of the Association Agreement and the negotiations, the National
Programmes for the Adoption of the Acquis where they are available, as well
as the process of developing the Action Plans, and various peer reviews that
have taken place to assess candidate countries' administrative capacity
in a number of areas, have served as additional sources. Council
deliberations and European Parliament reports and
resolutions |
| About FiFo Ost | Privacy | Legal Disclaimer | Contact | Forum | |
||