|
(Judgement of the Supreme Court of the Slovak Republic dated 28 March 2002, file No. 5 Obo 52/2002, published in the Collection of Opinions of the Supreme Court and Decisions of Courts of the Slovak Republic No. 3/2003)
It is necessary to consider the overall inactivity of the receiver or his/her partial inactivity as well, e.g. failure to respond to calls of the court or if he/she does not proceed according to the calls, as a significant reason for which the court may recall the receiver from his/her function also without a petition.
© Cechová & Partners (Bratislava)
|
